Mega-IPO candidates, including SpaceX, are expected to face a long road to entry to the S&P 500 Index, after the company that makes the rules rejected a proposal that included relaxing the requirement that they be profitable.
S&P Dow Jones Indicesâ index committee declined to remove a rule that companies generate positive net income for the past year, including the most recent quarter, the firm announced Thursday after a month-long consultation.
Evercore ISI research analysts donât expect Elon Muskâs rocket, satellite and artificial intelligence company to generate positive net income on an annual basis until 2027, according to a person familiar with the forecasts, who asked not to be identified as the information isnât public. That could mean its entry is held up until sometime in 2028 if the rule remains in place.
âEventually these mega-IPOs will be added to the S&P 500, unless their business models fail, so it is a question of timing,â said Jay Ritter, University of Florida emeritus professor and director of the IPO Initiative. âGiven the low floats and the huge amounts of money indexed to the S&P 500, I think itâs good that theyâll wait until the stocks have a more liquid market.â
The decision comes as Space Exploration Technologies Corp., as itâs formally known, prepares to start trading June 12. Itâs targeting a $1.8 trillion valuation, which would be bigger than all but six of the companies in the S&P 500, and larger than Muskâs own Tesla Inc.
The company is also set to enter indexes including the Nasdaq 100 as soon as the end of this month. Unlike S&P, Nasdaq Inc. did change its rules, allowing Nasdaq 100 entry in just 15 trading days, down from a three-month minimum. FTSE Russell adopted a similar approach, shortening the waiting time to five trading days.
A representative for SpaceX didnât immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for Evercore ISI declined to comment.
Anthropic PBC and OpenAI are also weighing IPOs as soon as this year, Bloomberg News reported, and could face similar hurdles to SpaceX despite expectations that the companies would be valued at more than $1 trillion each if they went public.
The AI model makersâ entry to the benchmark will depend on how operations and spending balance. Anthropicâs operating profit for the June quarter is expected to hit $559 million, but the company does not necessarily expect to be profitable in future quarters as it ramps up spending on computing resources and other costs, Bloomberg News reported.
OpenAI isnât expected to be profitable in the coming years.
âFrom a corporate strategy standpoint, itâs not irrational to choose to run at a loss,â Lawrence Creatura, a fund manager at PRSPCTV Capital LLC, said in an interview. Creatura pointed to large companies like Amazon.com Inc. and Uber Technologies Inc. which didnât join the benchmark until years after going public.
âIt will mean you wonât be in the S&P 500 for the moment,â Creatura said. âBut look at those companies now.â
The purpose of the S&P 500 is to emulate the US domestic market, according to Howard Silverblatt, former senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones. Maintaining the net income requirement is âthe hardest one for the S&P to defend,â he said, adding that he believes a GAAP requirement is beneficial to the index.
âThere are companies that are spending more on R&D than are making profits, even though they might have profitable lines,â he said in an interview, adding that SpaceX is one such company.
Research teams at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Evercore ISI expect SpaceXâs capital expenditures to soar to more than $360 billion in 2030, up from more than $20 billion last year, Bloomberg News has reported. Goldman Sachsâ team penciled in positive free cash flow for 2031 of more than $72 billion after hitting a trough of negative $105 billion in 2029, a person familiar with the matter has said.
Their fast inclusion in the benchmark would have led to about $14 billion in forced passive buying for SpaceX, more than $8 billion for OpenAI and close to $9 billion for Anthropic, according to Bloomberg Intelligence estimates.
Holding the line may have caused some consternation for market watchers while others were relieved that the rules will remain in effect.
For Michael Antonelli, market strategist at Baird, it wonât change the perception of the benchmark in the slightest.
âLetâs be honest: Itâs the worldâs premier stock-market index. Itâs the gold standard of stock-market indexes globally,â he said.
âThey have rules about profitability and index inclusion and theyâre just sticking by them,â Antonelli said. âJust because itâs Elon Musk and SpaceX, I donât think that theyâre willing to change something thatâs hard coded into their product.â